The human algorithm: Balancing empathy, tech & leadership with Pinaki Kathiari
Show notes
Join Staffbase’s Lottie Bazley as she sits down with Local Wisdom CEO Pinaki Kathiari for a deeply human conversation about clarity, communication, and the emotional reality of modern work. With nearly two decades of experience helping global brands turn dense and complex information into accessible content, Pinaki reveals the mindset behind simplifying without dumbing down, staying authentic without over-scripting, and communicating difficult messages with honesty and care.
Lottie and Pinaki explore when empathy becomes over-protection, why clarity matters most during layoffs and reorgs, and how innovation is often born from discomfort. This episode also dives headfirst into today’s hottest topic: AI. Pinaki breaks down why AI should act as a co-pilot — not a ghostwriter — and how over-reliance on automation is already eroding trust in the workplace. Packed with practical guidance and real-world examples, this conversation is a must-listen for anyone who wants to make work more human.
=========
Selected People, Places & Things Mentioned: Connect with Pinaki on LinkedIn; Local Wisdom, a digital communications agency that Pinaki is the owner and CEO of; Resource Hero, an intuitive resource management and time tracking solution on Salesforce; Why Does It Feel So Wrong To Be Human At Work?, a podcast where Pinaki Kathiari & Chris Lee challenge traditional best practices in the workplace; Chuck Gose, ICology Founder, Internal Communications Showman
=========
Follow the host and guest: Lottie Bazley on LinkedIn, Pinaki Kathiari on LinkedIn
=========
Join the You’ve Got Comms newsletter: https://insights.staffbase.com/join-the-comms-club
Follow Staffbase:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/staffbase/mycompany/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/Staffbase
=========
About Staffbase:
Staffbase is the first AI-native Employee Experience Platform. With Staffbase, companies reach everyone across app, intranet, email, SMS, digital signage, and Microsoft 365 — alongside new experiences like personalized podcasts and an AI assistant. Around 2000 organizations rely on Staffbase to inspire people and drive measurable impact.
More information: www.staffbase.com
Show transcript
00:00:00: For me, in communications, I really want to be sure and certain
00:00:02: For me, in communications, I really want to be sure and certain
00:00:04: that what I'm thinking and what comes out of my mouth
00:00:07: is translated in a correct way for whoever is now taking it in
00:00:11: because they're going to take some action on it.
00:00:13: So it's like if I'm not aiming it correctly,
00:00:16: we could miss the target.
00:00:17: we could miss the target.
00:00:30: Hello, everyone, and welcome
00:00:32: to a brand-new episode of the Aspire to Inspire Podcast.
00:00:36: My name is Lottie Bazley,
00:00:37: and I am an Internal Communications Manager here at Staffbase.
00:00:41: And today's guest is someone who sits at the intersection of creativity,
00:00:46: technology, and humanity, Pinaki Kathiari,
00:00:50: CEO and Owner of Local Wisdom.
00:00:53: For nearly two decades, Pinaki has led Local Wisdom's mission
00:00:57: to help communicators and marketing leaders bring complex ideas to life
00:01:01: through stories and visuals that truly resonate.
00:01:04: His team works behind the scenes with some of the world's biggest brands,
00:01:08: creating seamless digital experiences that empower communicators
00:01:11: to be more strategic while still staying human in how they connect.
00:01:16: He is also the Cofounder of Resource Hero,
00:01:19: a five-star Salesforce app helping organizations balance workloads,
00:01:24: track resources, and make better business decisions in real time.
00:01:28: And in today's episode, we're going to be talking about how to turn complexity
00:01:32: into clarity, the role of design and storytelling in internal comms,
00:01:37: and what it really means to make people feel more human at work.
00:01:41: So, that is quite the list.
00:01:43: Welcome today, Pinaki.
00:01:45: Is there anything I have missed off there?
00:01:48: Well, thank you so much, Lottie,
00:01:49: for having me, and thank you for that lovely introduction.
00:01:52: I feel like I need to
00:01:53: have you introduce me everywhere I go, but I think you've covered it.
00:01:57: I think you've covered it and I'm just excited to get into the topic.
00:02:00: This is exciting.
00:02:01: Amazing.
00:02:01: I do have to say, I also love your podcast, Why Does It Feel So Wrong?
00:02:05: So, I must admit, I've been feeling the pressure
00:02:08: on this podcast, but let's get into it.
00:02:12: No pressure. We'll just have a fun conversation.
00:02:14: Okay. I appreciate it. Thank you.
00:02:16: So, as I mentioned, you've spent almost two decades at Local Wisdom
00:02:20: helping global brands simplify really complex issues.
00:02:24: And you've mentioned before that your fascination with technology
00:02:27: design enables you to create solutions that are typically out of view.
00:02:33: So, could you tell me a bit
00:02:34: about that mindset and how it influences your role as CEO?
00:02:39: Yes, absolutely.
00:02:40: I think you said a little bit about it as far as the podcast,
00:02:44: Why Does It Feel So Wrong To Be Human At Work?
00:02:47: And it just occurred to me that a lot of what I do,
00:02:51: I try to
00:02:54: go a different way.
00:02:55: If everyone is zigging, I kind of zag.
00:02:58: And it's an interesting concept that came from
00:03:01: a lot of different things in my career.
00:03:02: But an example is that in the podcast, as you mentioned, it's very conversational.
00:03:08: And that was the concept of the podcast.
00:03:10: When we decided to do the podcast, it was a little bit more scripted.
00:03:14: And so, the first few episodes, when we were listening to it,
00:03:18: it looked like it's not holding that real conversational charm.
00:03:23: And it was because we knew what we were going to say.
00:03:24: You can't really have a conversation if you know what the other person
00:03:27: is going to say, because it takes away from the serendipity of it.
00:03:30: So, then we decided to simplify the complexity here because I think as humans,
00:03:35: we like to complexify things or make it more complicated.
00:03:39: So, we said, "Hey, you know what?
00:03:41: What if we just didn't know what the other person was saying
00:03:44: and started going at it from that standpoint?"
00:03:47: We still had the beats and knew that we had to stay on time,
00:03:51: but that serendipity made it so that when Chris [Lee] said a joke,
00:03:55: when I'm laughing, I'm really laughing and that really shines through, right?
00:03:59: So, I think that's where a lot of it comes from.
00:04:02: It's kind of like seeing things or being, I guess, maybe
00:04:06: brave enough to head into a little bit of unknown
00:04:10: to try to simplify where we are because, a lot of times, our brains will just
00:04:16: move us to this safe place.
00:04:18: And safe isn't always
00:04:21: easier in that way.
00:04:22: easier in that way.
00:04:23: Does that make sense what I'm saying?
00:04:24: It's a little bit ethereal because it's creative in that way.
00:04:27: No, absolutely.
00:04:28: I completely agree and it's something that I kind of . . .
00:04:31: As someone who's done podcasts before or public speaking, it's about
00:04:35: trying to make sure that you come into a conversation as prepared as you can be,
00:04:39: but without coming across too scripted, because then you lose this authenticity.
00:04:44: And I really feel like it's about finding that balance.
00:04:48: And I think a lot of the time, people come into something like this,
00:04:52: whether it be a podcast or a presentation or whatever it is that a leader
00:04:55: might be doing.
00:04:57: It's that they want to make sure that they have that clarity.
00:04:59: Therefore, they feel like they need to come in almost over-prepared to make sure
00:05:04: that the message that they want to get across is coming across.
00:05:08: And I know clarity is something that you talk a lot about that over the years.
00:05:12: So I'm curious, firstly, what your definition of clarity is.
00:05:16: And has that changed over the years and over your different career paths?
00:05:21: Yeah.
00:05:22: I think clarity for me might be coming
00:05:25: from what I'll call maybe a little bit of
00:05:30: undiagnosed OCD or something
00:05:32: like that in me from perhaps my family.
00:05:35: Like my dad, he used to keep all of his stuff
00:05:38: nicely, neatly organized in these boxes.
00:05:41: And if something was out of place, it would bother him.
00:05:47: And for me, it's kind of similar and I think about it as clarity.
00:05:52: For me, in communications, I really want to be sure and certain
00:05:58: that what I'm thinking and what comes out of my mouth
00:06:01: is translated in a correct way for whoever is now taking it in
00:06:04: because they're going to take some action on it.
00:06:07: So it's like if I'm not aiming it correctly,
00:06:11: we could miss the target.
00:06:13: And I think it came to me because of a story, because of a project
00:06:18: I worked on a long time ago, early in my career, I guess.
00:06:20: Speaking of podcasts, this was a long time ago before iPhones.
00:06:26: The Apple iPod was available, and podcasts had just come out.
00:06:31: And we had a client say, "Hey, I want to do a podcast.
00:06:34: Can you help us come up with a plan?" So, I was like, "Sure." And I said,
00:06:37: "Just to clarify, you want to create a series of audio recordings
00:06:42: that will then stream over RSS, and then people will download them
00:06:46: and get them on their iPod?" And he was like, "No,
00:06:50: we have an audio that we want to put on our website
00:06:53: that people can listen to." And I was like,
00:06:55: "Okay, wow, that's much different than what I'm thinking about here."
00:06:58: So if I didn't clarify that, we would have gone
00:07:01: into totally somewhere else and wasted a lot of time.
00:07:03: And I think that story keeps coming back to me to say that.
00:07:07: I just need to be certain that what we're both thinking about is the same picture.
00:07:12: Yeah, absolutely.
00:07:14: I really like that example because that's a lot of . . .
00:07:18: There's hundreds and thousands of books or podcasts, audiobooks
00:07:21: about communication.
00:07:23: But I find that reconfirming what it is that someone else is saying to you
00:07:28: is just a key component of any form of communication,
00:07:32: whether that be if you're having an argument with your partner
00:07:35: or you're coming to a business agreement with someone, that clarification of,
00:07:40: like, "This is what I'm understanding that you're saying."
00:07:44: So, I really appreciate the fact that someone like yourself has that
00:07:49: in the back of your mind as you're going through a lot of different things.
00:07:53: Yeah, a lot of these things have come from making mistakes in the past.
00:07:57: I've seen like if you're not clear and if you don't clarify what could happen,
00:08:01: and maybe it's a little bit of PTSD from that, where I'm like, "You know what?
00:08:04: I got to make sure that you really understand
00:08:06: what I'm talking about." So, yeah, you're right.
00:08:08: I often do clarify.
00:08:10: And I sometimes ask others to clarify or find ways to ask questions
00:08:14: to make sure it is clear, because we've all played
00:08:17: that game of telephone as kids, and we know what happens.
00:08:21: Absolutely, yeah.
00:08:22: We've all been there.
00:08:23: And the best thing you can do is obviously learn from your mistakes
00:08:26: rather than wallow, which is sometimes the easier thing to do.
00:08:30: As I mentioned in the intro, you've said before that your fascination
00:08:35: lies at this intersection of technology, design, and humanity.
00:08:41: So, can you talk me through what that means for you, and maybe
00:08:44: walk me through a moment in your career where those three forces collided?
00:08:51: Yes. What that means for me, I think it's
00:08:54: just something natural for me, mainly because of just,
00:08:59: I think, the way I was raised and part of my career path.
00:09:04: For example, as growing up,
00:09:07: I always wanted to be an engineer because my dad was an engineer.
00:09:10: And then high school came,
00:09:12: and I wanted to be a writer, a poet, an artist, a DJ, a music producer.
00:09:16: My dad was like, "No, you're going to go into engineering."
00:09:19: And, so, I went in college.
00:09:22: I studied computer science and psychology.
00:09:25: And in the world of work, I was a writer, an entrepreneur,
00:09:28: a consultant, designer, developer, played roles like information
00:09:32: architect, strategist, communicator, leader, marketer, sales.
00:09:36: And so I've been all over the place.
00:09:38: And I think, for that, it gives me this perspective.
00:09:42: So, I can see
00:09:45: when these things come together, what does it feel like,
00:09:48: because it almost is in me in that way.
00:09:51: A moment when those three things came together,
00:09:53: or all of these things came together, is in a
00:09:58: few different places. I guess
00:10:00: its really kind of right to the humanity comes into anything we do
00:10:04: with technology and design is trying to solve a human need.
00:10:09: And technology and design are different means to achieve that.
00:10:15: A few ways that it comes together.
00:10:16: One was, I think, when we create,
00:10:21: when we're concepting a solution, we're always thinking about that need.
00:10:25: For example, there was a solution
00:10:28: where an HR team approached us and asked,
00:10:32: "All right, we've set up these new competency models
00:10:36: for this organization, and we need a way to convey them."
00:10:40: And when we looked at all the documentation on it,
00:10:43: it was these thick binders that people had to open up, read,
00:10:47: find their place in, and learn where they need to go next.
00:10:50: And, so I said, "Hey, we have technology, and we have design.
00:10:50: And, so I said, "Hey, we have technology, and we have design.
00:10:52: Instead of giving them these binders, let's ask them a few questions
00:10:57: when they log on to this site, and then we'll actually just
00:11:02: get all the right components together and give them a little map
00:11:05: or a journey of where they are today and where they need to go."
00:11:10: It's thinking about these busy folks
00:11:13: who have to, now, adapt to this new model and comb through these documents.
00:11:19: And so, we're like, "Hey, let's bring some more humanity.
00:11:21: Let's save them some time and trouble by using technology and design just
00:11:26: to shape the information in a way that's just specific and relevant to them."
00:11:31: Love that.
00:11:32: I think that's a really, really good approach.
00:11:33: And actually, super interesting that you talk about your
00:11:38: trajectory into your career with this whole engineer versus DJ-type thing.
00:11:42: I'm constantly arguing with myself.
00:11:46: No, no, no, I had a similar thing where I didn't really know what I wanted
00:11:49: to be when I "grew" up.
00:11:51: So, I went down the
00:11:53: English/psychology, but also the physics/maths route.
00:11:56: I realized physics/maths is not for me.
00:11:59: Luckily, not something that I needed to bring into my daily life.
00:12:03: But I just love that you've taken
00:12:07: that knowledge and that passion that you have
00:12:09: for all of those different things and have found
00:12:12: a way to combine all of them rather than just saying, "Okay.
00:12:15: Well, I'm going down this route or that route."
00:12:18: Yeah, absolutely.
00:12:19: I want to challenge you to bring physics into this somehow because I think the key
00:12:24: part of your question, what I loved, is the intersectionality part.
00:12:29: Because it's like we have these different facets of our lives and whatnot.
00:12:32: And there's something really special and really you
00:12:37: about that intersection of these things.
00:12:40: It's funny.
00:12:42: Chuck Gose and I are working on a talk, and it's
00:12:45: actually relating physics concepts to communications.
00:12:49: And those two things don't match because communicators
00:12:53: do not like math and physics, but there's a correlation
00:12:55: and something really interesting that we could pick out from that.
00:12:59: Oh, my gosh.
00:12:59: Well, you'll have to bring me along for the ride with that, for sure.
00:13:03: Yes, we hope you're there.
00:13:04: Yeah, bring me along.
00:13:06: So, there was a point that you mentioned just now about,
00:13:11: rather than
00:13:12: giving people binders of all of this really complex information,
00:13:16: you started from a different point, like this out-of-the-box thinking.
00:13:19: And this is the question
00:13:20: that I've been really looking forward to ask you is because of this
00:13:24: turning complexity into simplicity, but without watering things down.
00:13:29: And that's something that I know I've personally struggled with, especially
00:13:31: if we're communicating a really technical operational change
00:13:35: or really safety-focused change, is making sure that you're
00:13:41: keeping it simple for people, but, like I say, without watering stuff down.
00:13:45: So, if you're faced with this really dense, technical content,
00:13:50: what is your first step in making that relatable?
00:13:54: And what do you find that communicators might be overlooking
00:13:58: in that process?
00:14:02: Yeah.
00:14:02: Great question, yeah.
00:14:05: Maybe the answer in there lies into that DJ part.
00:14:08: We're like mixing and mashing things together, too.
00:14:12: But I think it starts with the technical content, whatever that is.
00:14:17: I definitely need to understand it.
00:14:20: Maybe not the details of every little thing,
00:14:22: but I just conceptually understand what this is and it's trying to do,
00:14:26: and make sure that it is of value
00:14:28: because then we have a product issue if that's not of value.
00:14:32: The second thing would be just, and probably more
00:14:35: important, is to understand the audience and where are they
00:14:39: mentally, educationally, what's the kind of background, right?
00:14:43: As I was saying, all of our experiences shape who we are today.
00:14:48: So we're just like, "What is their background, and where are they today?"
00:14:52: I think many times, that's overlooked because it's like the business has a need
00:14:57: to do something.
00:14:58: And we're not really thinking about the other person
00:15:01: and where they are in that.
00:15:03: And it's really interesting.
00:15:04: I liken it to parent-child relationships all the time.
00:15:08: Because when I want someone to do
00:15:11: ABC, so, I communicate them and tell them to do ABC.
00:15:15: but if I'm not approaching it with empathy and where they are,
00:15:19: the message is not going to land correctly.
00:15:21: Actually, in fact, I have a five-year-old, so we have a young one again.
00:15:25: And I'm kind of relearning different ways of parenting.
00:15:29: So, when you're communicating
00:15:32: in a time when children are angry
00:15:36: or disappointed or frustrated,
00:15:39: parts of their brain where they're understanding and taking in
00:15:44: logic and communication is just not working.
00:15:46: We're in this animal part of our brain.
00:15:48: So, it's understanding, "All right, where are they
00:15:52: today or where are they right now?
00:15:54: How do I get them to a state first of taking in information?"
00:16:00: And then let me give them the information in a way that's made for them.
00:16:05: Actually, if I take it back to that example with
00:16:10: the competency model in HR, we had these new dense
00:16:16: competency models, which had career
00:16:19: progression paths with specific roles, and what you need to do
00:16:24: and trainings that you needed to do to level up.
00:16:27: And then on the other side, we have
00:16:30: marketers who were global
00:16:33: across the globe and very busy as marketers are.
00:16:38: And they want to grow and sell, but how do we then find the right way?
00:16:42: So, we concepted that product.
00:16:47: And then, in communicating it, it wasn't like
00:16:51: the new competency model or learn the new competency model.
00:16:55: It was like, "Welcome to your career coach." So we're now talking to them
00:17:00: in a language that's now attuned to what they're interested in.
00:17:05: And it draws some interest from them, too.
00:17:09: And it conveys that, "This is a coach.
00:17:12: We're helping you. This is going to be easy.
00:17:13: We're pulling you along the way.
00:17:15: We're asking you questions to draw out the right answers for you and things
00:17:18: like that." And so that's really where it comes from.
00:17:21: It's like taking that step back to say, "Where are they?"
00:17:24: And how do I change this message or communicate it in a way
00:17:28: that we could actually get in their minds, and then be open and receptive to,
00:17:33: as opposed to defensive and, "Oh, here's another thing I have to do."
00:17:37: I love that.
00:17:39: It's wild how much you can do with something like that
00:17:42: because it's not any different information that you're conveying to them.
00:17:45: It's just figuring out where they are and just shifting that perspective of,
00:17:49: "How do we want people to receive this?" Therefore, what do we need to do
00:17:53: in order to make that happen?
00:17:54: Absolutely, it's kind of like . . .
00:17:57: I'm sorry to cut you off. I apologize.
00:18:00: I'll just say it like this, too, because it might resonate.
00:18:03: As parents or whatnot, or even at home
00:18:07: dynamics, you're like, "I want someone to do something.
00:18:10: I want my son to take out the garbage or the trash." And I could just
00:18:14: forcefully tell them, "Hey, we have to do it," or we could talk
00:18:18: and get to an understanding of the type of home we want to keep
00:18:23: and get a higher level of understanding of what it means to be this way.
00:18:29: Love that.
00:18:31: Maybe use this
00:18:31: trash example with my husband.
00:18:35: Yes, exactly.
00:18:37: You know what?
00:18:37: If you're angry at him for [not] taking out the trash,
00:18:40: you're not going to have a constructive conversation about how to fix it, right?
00:18:43: Absolutely.
00:18:45: I really like that bit that you talk about, understanding your audience.
00:18:48: And I think that's something that communicators
00:18:51: in general, also marketers, are really good at doing,
00:18:55: understanding the audience, knowing where they're at,
00:18:59: how much time they have in their day
00:19:00: to read communications, all of that kind of stuff.
00:19:02: But something really resonated
00:19:03: with me there when you talked about understanding the content yourself.
00:19:07: And I think even just recently, we had some organizational change at Staffbase.
00:19:12: It was a new sales process that came in.
00:19:14: And I was working through the comms that this person had put together,
00:19:17: and I was just like, "I don't know whether this is good comms or not
00:19:20: because I don't understand what this change in process is."
00:19:24: And it was only when I then just dropped a five-minute diary entry
00:19:28: with this guy, and we just talked about it.
00:19:29: I was like, "Can you just talk me through what this actually is?"
00:19:32: And as soon as I understood it, I was like, "Okay.
00:19:35: Now, I can figure out how to communicate this." So, I think that is something
00:19:39: that we probably forget more as communicators
00:19:42: because we think, "Well, we don't need to know the technical stuff.
00:19:45: We're just portraying the message." But as soon as I understand what this process
00:19:51: actually looked like and what it meant for the people it was impacting,
00:19:54: I was like, "Cool, I know how to write these comms." So,
00:19:58: that absolutely resonates with me there.
00:20:01: And you having that conversation and that dialogue, a dialogue helps you to
00:20:08: shape how you want to get the information or how best you learn information.
00:20:12: So you're asking questions, "Let me understand this," so
00:20:15: you could not only understand it, but also validate its value, right?
00:20:19: Because if it's not a great idea, you'd be like, "Wait a minute."
00:20:24: If it didn't make value for the whole company,
00:20:26: you'd be like, "Wait a minute," because you need to do that
00:20:29: before being able to convey that value the other way around.
00:20:34: Kudos to you.
00:20:35: Thank you.
00:20:36: Finally figured it out.
00:20:38: And actually, I want to ask a bit of a follow-up question.
00:20:41: We've talked about simplifying technical content,
00:20:45: but I guess another element of communication is talking
00:20:48: about that more human-centric, bad-news delivery.
00:20:52: So, for example, company reorg, there's going to be layoffs.
00:20:56: And I've certainly been guilty of it myself,
00:20:58: but I've seen it with leaders, too, where they kind of almost dial up
00:21:02: this empathy, humanity, over-communicate,
00:21:05: because they're delivering something that's quite humanly impactful.
00:21:10: How do we make sure that when we're delivering bad news
00:21:13: that we still lead with clarity?
00:21:16: Yes. I'm curious to know, because I've seen some things also more
00:21:21: the other way around, where it's just too little communication and whatnot.
00:21:25: What are examples of over-humanizing communications
00:21:32: are you seeing in these situations, if you don't mind me asking?
00:21:35: I think it's very much to do with leaders understand that there are going to be
00:21:40: some people that are scared by this, frustrated by this, and rather than just
00:21:46: going straight to the message, which is, "Hey, we're doing a reorg,
00:21:50: X many people are leaving,"
00:21:53: that they go through this almost
00:21:56: really long-winded narrative.
00:21:57: Oh, yes, this transformational narrative of
00:22:02: streamlining and operationalizing.
00:22:06: I know what you mean now. Okay, cool.
00:22:08: You know, to look at it from the other perspective, as I've been on
00:22:13: that side of the fence as well,
00:22:14: it is not fun.
00:22:17: And when we have to deliver bad news as humans, we just don't like to do that.
00:22:21: And so, I understand it.
00:22:24: You try to, I think,
00:22:27: hide or subdue the pain that
00:22:30: this event is going to cause a lot of people.
00:22:34: And so, it becomes natural to try to sugarcoat it
00:22:39: or to try to lengthen it or avoid it.
00:22:42: I don't want to take out the garbage.
00:22:44: So, let me avoid it.
00:22:48: That's where it's coming from.
00:22:49: So, I guess in one aspect, the fact that they are feeling that is a good thing.
00:22:56: And it happens to the best of us when we're all in a state
00:23:00: of stress, pressure, and levels of sadness and anger.
00:23:04: So, I think communicators, I think that's where
00:23:09: it is really important to have this relationship
00:23:13: with your communicator and your leader, to be able to have these
00:23:17: difficult conversations.
00:23:19: I understand this initiative, or I understand the way you're
00:23:22: going about it.
00:23:23: I think it would resonate best if we were a little bit
00:23:26: more straightforward with it or straight up with it and honest about it.
00:23:33: I know it's really scary.
00:23:35: So, what I tell folks
00:23:36: and what I've done in the past is I'm more honest upfront about it.
00:23:40: And I'm
00:23:43: going out of my way or, as a company or organization,
00:23:47: we're all going out of our way to help anyone who's impacted.
00:23:50: So, I'm letting out
00:23:53: the news earlier, giving them
00:23:57: an ample window, and we're all finding ways to help each other out.
00:24:02: There's things that we've done.
00:24:03: So, it changes from a transformation
00:24:08: to help the company to a transformation to help the company, but this is a
00:24:13: bad byproduct of it, if it needs to be that way.
00:24:17: And here's how we're going to support this bad byproduct of it.
00:24:21: So, for those who are impacted, we're
00:24:25: doing this, we're doing this, we're doing things like that.
00:24:28: So, we've done resume updates, mock interviews,
00:24:33: where I'm personally reaching out to folks
00:24:36: who might have a need for people being impacted and things like that.
00:24:40: I know not everyone could do all of those things,
00:24:43: but just showing up earlier,
00:24:45: saying what's happening, and really trying to support those
00:24:50: who are impacted in that negative way, I think, goes a long way.
00:24:53: My whole philosophy in business and networking and things like that,
00:24:58: I think companies come and go.
00:25:00: I think relationships are
00:25:03: key across companies, right?
00:25:04: Even when you and I had met, you were in a different role
00:25:08: within Staffbase and a different sort of relationship
00:25:10: with Staffbase, but our relationship is stronger
00:25:14: throughout all of the different roles that you've been.
00:25:16: And wherever we go next, we'll be thinking of each other and being like,
00:25:20: "Maybe I need to get Lottie on my podcast," and things like that.
00:25:24: Oh, I mean, please, absolutely, would love that.
00:25:28: I think it's really interesting what you say there about that.
00:25:31: I guess, usually, a lot of what we as communicators
00:25:35: want to put across is the, "Why is this happening?"
00:25:38: But when you see really impactful change comms, I think people tend to care
00:25:42: less about the why, or they don't care about the why first.
00:25:46: They care about the what first.
00:25:48: "What does this mean for me?"
00:25:50: And I guess the, "How will you support me through this?"
00:25:54: before I maybe end up caring,
00:25:56: or maybe even not caring about the why.
00:25:59: Exactly.
00:26:00: The why is irrelevant for some people, right?
00:26:03: Yes, exactly.
00:26:05: So, now, I know I feel like we can't go through this podcast without talking
00:26:09: about AI, because that's just something that's just so, so huge at the moment.
00:26:14: And when I was doing some prep for this podcast, I saw a post on your LinkedIn,
00:26:18: where you were talking about the Harvard Business Review that there was
00:26:23: a stat in there that said 62% of employees use AI to draft emails or documents.
00:26:28: I am in part of that.
00:26:30: But 42% of leaders can't tell if it's from their team or whether it's AI,
00:26:36: which you said, rightfully so, leads to an erosion of trust.
00:26:40: And I really love what you said, that
00:26:41: AI should be a co-pilot rather than a ghostwriter.
00:26:45: Can you talk me through your thoughts on that?
00:26:49: Yeah.
00:26:50: There's two things that I think led me there
00:26:54: besides the Harvard Business Review data.
00:26:57: The first was I found myself sometimes playing too much
00:27:00: with an AI to make it sound like me.
00:27:05: If I'm using AI to ghostwrite for me, I'm like, "That's not exactly me.
00:27:09: I'll change this, I'll change that.
00:27:10: It's not exactly this." So,
00:27:12: what started being more helpful for me is to draft up ideas,
00:27:16: and then perhaps have it edit and us working together in that way.
00:27:21: But I think
00:27:23: solely relying on an AI to write for
00:27:26: you and be a ghostwriter, one, it's innately not you.
00:27:31: Because even if it wasn't AI, if it was someone else writing it,
00:27:35: it's still not you, so there's that.
00:27:39: There's a trust element there, which has been going on for all this time
00:27:42: because executives have communicators and writers
00:27:46: who write their speeches and things like that.
00:27:47: So that's nothing new.
00:27:49: But it's like the communicators are human,
00:27:52: and there's still a touch of humanness to all of that.
00:27:56: The second thing is something that happened to me.
00:27:59: I met somebody because I meet folks all the time.
00:28:03: We connected on LinkedIn.
00:28:04: We also had a good conversation on Zoom.
00:28:09: And I think it was a week or two later,
00:28:11: I get a LinkedIn message and this person was asking me
00:28:15: for my thoughts on something, some advice on something.
00:28:19: Actually,
00:28:21: it was late at night.
00:28:21: I was in bed, and I'm typing up this response.
00:28:24: I just got this eerie feeling and thought.
00:28:26: I was like, "Wait, is this a bot?"
00:28:29: And so, I saved my response somewhere else
00:28:35: and I responded by asking a question or a clarifying question to see
00:28:41: if it was a bot or what the response would be from this person.
00:28:45: And I did ask, and I actually never got a response back.
00:28:49: And so, I was like, "Yes."
00:28:52: So it, a little bit, confirmed this belief or idea that it's a bot.
00:28:57: It was the way the question was worded.
00:28:59: And when I was thinking about our conversation, that made me think this.
00:29:03: So I was like, it's one thing for us
00:29:06: to have a working relationship when you need advice
00:29:12: or another opinion on something, and I could offer that to you.
00:29:16: It's another thing if you're blasting a network and mining
00:29:19: data off of a collective audience.
00:29:22: And I think if this person would have been honest
00:29:26: about that intent, I would have responded much better.
00:29:29: But it seemed a little,
00:29:33: I'm not saying dishonest, but
00:29:34: it didn't seem as genuine as an actual conversation.
00:29:38: So, all of those two things got me together thinking that what happens
00:29:44: when we know that all comms
00:29:47: and all emails are generated and sent by AI in the future?
00:29:52: How are we going to feel about the relationships with our managers
00:29:56: or our coworkers or anyone?
00:29:59: It's like you start questioning that relationship
00:30:05: and trust fabric here because,
00:30:09: nonetheless, the AI doesn't care at the end of the day.
00:30:14: It can potentially empathize, but it doesn't truly care.
00:30:18: Yeah, absolutely.
00:30:19: And I totally agree with what you say there about that.
00:30:23: It's not necessarily that it's dishonesty, but I guess it's
00:30:26: that inauthenticity, which is something that we talk about a lot in comms.
00:30:31: And there are definitely things that I can spot myself
00:30:34: when someone sent a comm that is AI-generated.
00:30:38: I think there's this ChatGPT hyphen that it hyphenates everything.
00:30:43: I use a lot of hyphens in my writing anyway, but the ChatGPT one is somehow
00:30:46: a little bit longer.
00:30:48: Yes, the em dash.
00:30:52: But something that I try and do,
00:30:53: so one of the big uses for AI for me is I will write a message.
00:30:58: I need to ask someone to do something for me,
00:31:01: and I'll write what I would say conversationally,
00:31:05: but it needs to be in a Slack message to an exec leadership member.
00:31:08: So, they have not much time.
00:31:11: I need to give them enough context,
00:31:13: but not too much context that they don't have time to read it.
00:31:17: I need them to know what actions I require from them,
00:31:20: but I also want to come across firm but polite.
00:31:23: And I think that's
00:31:24: a really good way of using it because it's still authentically my voice.
00:31:28: I'm just tailoring it to my audience.
00:31:31: And I think that you don't lose authenticity there.
00:31:35: You're just trying to, I guess, dial up the productivity of it.
00:31:39: Yeah, in that scenario, you're working with an editor in that way.
00:31:43: So, it's more of a creative process.
00:31:47: You're brainstorming with someone as opposed to telling me, "Just write this
00:31:50: and send this for me." And I think that's
00:31:55: the difference here.
00:31:57: There's something I thought of in there because
00:32:00: there's been times when I'm sending emails, and I want it to end
00:32:03: with, "And I typed this email myself." You know what I mean?
00:32:08: Because there's something about the time it takes me to type an email
00:32:12: to someone that's showing
00:32:16: a bit of care or showing a bit of love. Like, I took the time to do this.
00:32:19: I didn't just push a button and do that.
00:32:22: So, I think there's something to that effect, but I totally agree.
00:32:27: Just to be clear,
00:32:29: I'm sitting in this in-between of
00:32:33: AI hype and apocalypse.
00:32:35: But it is incredibly helpful and time-saving for me.
00:32:40: I do use it, and I am using it to save a lot of time, crunch
00:32:44: a lot of information, and I am getting a lot of value from the use of AI.
00:32:50: So, I just wanted to clarify and want to make sure that I'm
00:32:54: not in one way or the other at this very moment.
00:32:57: Good to know.
00:32:58: Thank you for clarifying.
00:32:59: Yes, we just have to be careful.
00:33:02: Yeah, no, I'm not terrified.
00:33:04: We just have to be careful.
00:33:05: It is an extremely powerful tool that
00:33:08: we all have access to in our back pockets.
00:33:11: And that's probably
00:33:13: the main interesting thing about it, what we can do.
00:33:17: If you don't mind, I'll share another quick story on AI, just to be careful.
00:33:20: Of course.
00:33:21: Is that I was talking to an
00:33:24: HR executive, maybe about a month ago, and she was telling me
00:33:28: the story of how she had to rewrite an email that
00:33:33: a leader was going to send to the whole team.
00:33:35: And I was like, "Oh, man, you should have
00:33:38: just told them to use ChatGPT."
00:33:41: And they were like, "The leader did,"
00:33:44: and I was like, "Oh, so it wrote
00:33:47: that type of email, even
00:33:50: to GPT." So it's, again,
00:33:54: giving me pause to think, "We have to be careful
00:33:57: because the AI is giving us the answer that we want to hear
00:34:01: or think we want to hear." So, what you were saying is using it
00:34:07: as an editor is a great thing.
00:34:09: Another great use for AI is to use it as an empathizer.
00:34:13: So, I'm sending this message to this audience.
00:34:17: How would they take it? How would they interpret it?
00:34:20: What are some of the objections that they might have to it?
00:34:24: That is a great way for you to then start with you and then start
00:34:29: crafting or finding different ways to make the communication better.
00:34:34: Absolutely.
00:34:35: And on a really similar note,
00:34:36: I was at a conference the other day, and they were talking about using AI
00:34:39: as a challenger.
00:34:40: So, on a similar way, is that like, "I think this audience
00:34:44: will take this from my communication, or I think they might feel this way.
00:34:48: Challenge me.
00:34:50: Give me some things that I might not have thought
00:34:52: about before." And again, that's that you're not losing authenticity.
00:34:56: It's just improving something that is already there that exists.
00:35:01: Exactly.
00:35:02: And I think that's really what's key in the use of AI.
00:35:05: It's like the way you use it, I think, as we've seen, can
00:35:10: increase or erode trust.
00:35:13: And we want to kind of lean towards it increasing trust.
00:35:16: For sure.
00:35:17: And on a similar level then, not just talking about AI specifically,
00:35:22: but what does innovation look like for you today?
00:35:26: And how do you decide which emerging technologies are worth
00:35:31: the time spent integrating them into your communication strategies?
00:35:36: Ooh, that's a good question.
00:35:38: Innovation.
00:35:39: Innovation is fun because it's always scary.
00:35:42: I think that's one of the things about innovation that I think
00:35:45: it always has this interesting emotional pull.
00:35:48: But I think for anyone who's
00:35:52: asking for something innovative, you're asking for fear.
00:35:56: And you have to be comfortable with that because, by
00:35:59: definition, innovation is doing something new.
00:36:02: And whenever any of us are doing something new, there's a bit of fear there.
00:36:07: So, it's one of the things that I've come to grips.
00:36:11: I think the most innovative things that I've created
00:36:15: really do start off as a pain point
00:36:17: that I've seen and witnessed and felt.
00:36:20: And for me, the process is
00:36:25: understanding this pain its about just . . .
00:36:28: It's funny.
00:36:30: Through different experiences, different ideas, and random
00:36:33: things come together, and it forms this idea of,
00:36:37: "Ooh, that's very interesting,"
00:36:39: and then my heart pounds a little, and then I can't get it out of my mind.
00:36:43: You know, we started this with the podcast,
00:36:45: Why Does It Feel So Wrong to Be Human At Work?
00:36:48: That started with me as a pain point.
00:36:52: And it came from, we have monthly all-hands roundtables at Local Wisdom.
00:36:57: And as part of that, we have a ceremony
00:37:00: where, at the beginning, we give each other kudos.
00:37:04: Anyone can get up and say thank you
00:37:08: to someone else for something specific that they did within that last month.
00:37:11: And it's a fun time.
00:37:12: Sometimes it's short.
00:37:13: Sometimes it could go on long.
00:37:15: When it goes long, like past 20 minutes, I've noticed people
00:37:20: starting to apologize for having more thank yous to say.
00:37:24: And I've said, "Hey, if we spend this whole time
00:37:26: just thanking each other, that's a win." But people still felt that urge.
00:37:31: And at times, I even felt that urge.
00:37:33: I actually did apologize. "I'm sorry.
00:37:34: I have a few more thank yous to give."
00:37:37: And it just came out.
00:37:38: And then when it came out, I thought about it right afterwards.
00:37:40: I'm like, "Wow,
00:37:40: why does it feel so wrong
00:37:42: to just sit here and thank each other for the work that we've done?"
00:37:44: There are so many positives that come out of it.
00:37:46: There's training out of it. There's
00:37:49: repeated learning that comes out of it. So,
00:37:52: that thought says, "All right, there's this pain of something that feels right
00:37:57: to be human to thank each other, but it feels wrong in the work context."
00:38:02: And that's where the concept emerged right now.
00:38:06: And it was like, I think you could ask my wife and son,
00:38:10: because I kind of came out, it was like,
00:38:11: "I want to come up with this concept called Why Does It Feel So Wrong
00:38:15: To Be Human At Work?" And they looked at me blinking like, "Are you crazy?
00:38:19: That's weird." But I think if you have a great idea
00:38:23: and you tell someone that and they're not a little afraid of it,
00:38:28: then your idea is too normal.
00:38:30: They've heard of it before.
00:38:31: It's not really that innovative.
00:38:33: Yeah, absolutely. Love that way of thinking.
00:38:35: And can I just say, genuinely, vouch for the podcast.
00:38:38: I've been listening to it the last couple of weeks, and I really, really enjoy it.
00:38:42: Really appreciate it.
00:38:43: Thank you so much, Lottie.
00:38:44: Of course.
00:38:44: Well, unfortunately, we are coming to the end of our time today,
00:38:48: but before I let you go, I wanted to give you a couple of quickfire
00:38:52: questions just to really put you on the spot.
00:38:56: So, number one, if you could fix one thing
00:39:00: about how people communicate at work, what would that be?
00:39:05: I would say
00:39:06: before speaking,
00:39:09: think about where that response is coming from even in yourself.
00:39:13: A lot of times, if we are angry at someone for someone
00:39:17: or get a certain feeling about someone else
00:39:19: for something that's happening, it's usually because there's something in us
00:39:23: that they're tugging at that we're not comfortable with in ourselves.
00:39:26: So, look inside before we communicate outwards.
00:39:31: Fabulous. Love that.
00:39:33: Great answer. And now, one more.
00:39:35: I gave this whole spiel in your intro about all of your accolades
00:39:38: and all these incredible things that you've done
00:39:40: and the tools that you've built
00:39:41: and the teams that you've led and the podcast that you host.
00:39:44: Is there one daily habit that you have that
00:39:47: keeps you grounded?
00:39:51: Yeah. The first thing that came to my mind is
00:39:53: the habit of having time to think.
00:39:56: And sometimes, admittedly, I will feel guilty for having time to think.
00:40:02: But at the end of the day,
00:40:04: I am always grateful for making that time to think and reset
00:40:09: all the things that are happening
00:40:10: and taking in all the things that are happening so I could respond
00:40:15: in a more
00:40:18: calm, reasonable, rational way
00:40:20: after I've had a chance to have everything settle.
00:40:25: Love that. Couldn't agree more.
00:40:26: And something that I've tried to
00:40:27: be doing more of this year is giving myself grace and space,
00:40:31: and whether that's to think about how you're truly feeling about something
00:40:36: or to just give yourself 10 minutes to not feel guilty about lying in bed and
00:40:41: reading a book or taking time
00:40:44: to myself to go on a run rather than walk the dog, all of these things.
00:40:47: I think it's just making sure you also don't feel guilty
00:40:50: about taking that time as well.
00:40:53: Yeah.
00:40:54: I'll freestyle just a little bit real quick because it reminded me
00:40:57: of something back to your physics learning.
00:41:02: And I remember thinking of something
00:41:04: where pressure also creates pressure.
00:41:08: If you're pushing forward, I guess there's, oh, man, what is the . . .
00:41:14: When you're pushing forward, the world is trying to always create balance.
00:41:19: So if you're pushing . . .
00:41:21: like I want A, B, and C a lot, and you're moving it forward,
00:41:25: the world wants you to not have it because it wants to be balanced.
00:41:29: But if you don't want A, B, and C, or
00:41:32: think about how do I go the other way around,
00:41:35: the world will try to create balance and get you A, B, and C.
00:41:39: Wild stuff.
00:41:41: Let that sink in for a second.
00:41:42: There you go.
00:41:43: This is a real mic-drop moment.
00:41:45: And the fact that you've managed to bring physics into it,
00:41:47: which is something that I admitted
00:41:49: I didn't think was possible, but absolutely, that's a super example.
00:41:53: Thank you so much.
00:41:53: There's a physics law behind that one, and I can't come up with it.
00:41:56: I forgot it off the top of my head, but I'll probably drop you a post later.
00:42:00: You're asking the wrong person.
00:42:02: Absolutely.
00:42:03: Well, thank you so, so much for joining us today, Pinaki.
00:42:05: I've genuinely learned a lot from this conversation.
00:42:07: So, I'm sure that listeners will have some great nuggets to take away.
00:42:12: Before I let you go, quickly, can you let the people know where they can connect
00:42:15: with you, learn more about Local Wisdom, or tune into the podcast?
00:42:20: Absolutely, yes.
00:42:22: How much time you got? I'm just kidding.
00:42:24: Connect with me on LinkedIn.
00:42:25: You'll find Pinaki Kathiari.
00:42:27: There's not many of me out there.
00:42:29: Find Local Wisdom.
00:42:31: We're localwisdom.com.
00:42:33: We're like spackle for comms teams.
00:42:35: So, if you have a crack in talent,
00:42:38: technology, strategy, or execution, we can fill that and make it stronger.
00:42:42: And wherever you listen to podcasts, just search, Why Does It Feel So Wrong
00:42:45: To Be Human At Work? And you'll find us there.
00:42:48: Thank you, Lottie, and thank you, Staffbase.
00:42:50: Of course.
00:42:51: Thank you so much. I have been Lottie Bazley.
00:42:53: And I hope you've enjoyed this podcast, this episode of Aspire to Inspire.
00:42:57: Be sure to join us again soon.
00:42:59: Thank you so much.
00:43:01: Thank you. Be well, everybody.
00:43:04: Hey, if you're getting value from today's conversation,
00:43:08: make sure you subscribe right now
00:43:10: so you don't miss any future episodes of the Aspire to Inspire Podcast.
New comment